Open Letters

Share this post

ON IDEAL DELIBERATIVE DISTANCE

adamgolding.substack.com

ON IDEAL DELIBERATIVE DISTANCE

Of the people you disagree with, who is at an "ideal deliberative distance""? What if you were more charitable? What if you were more honest?

Adam Golding
Jul 15, 2022
2
Share
Share this post

ON IDEAL DELIBERATIVE DISTANCE

adamgolding.substack.com

[adapted from https://www.facebook.com/adamgolding/posts/pfbid02eBSc4EYmfFdsVM6DvsRaA5sXo2rLZSbbjSUSSFusiGiAkh9dSGYdGMtyz2sSpjX3l]

We look on in horror as democracy fails in many objectives, like major existential threats, where the whole stands to gain the most from wresting power from the richest part and changing course.

We're the victim of many circumstances for which we aren't to be blamed, but I have to tell you: *you're part of the problem with democracy* if you:

- don't regularly engage in very private deliberation with others who disagree

- don't regularly engage in very public deliberation with others who disagree

- don't consume any contradictory news sources

- don't vote (but do the part above first)

- don't systematically apply "radical honesty" (see: https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10107446637905022&id=28125583 )

Ironically you're in one sense more free to spend your time otherwise in a Theoretical Liberal Autocracy, but Democracy simply doesn't work without these steps, and it also doesn't work if you only do the 4th step. I've suggested in a few places (such as here:

)

that there's an ideal 'deliberative distance' for people to have a productive conversation:

- too close and it's too easy to resolve disagreements--you're in an echo chamber

- too far and the principle of charity

( facebook.com/adamgolding/posts/10107882836754032 ) breaks down, and it becomes unlikely that views will change

You can operate at a larger deliberative distance if you apply the principle of charity more vigorously.

I think eventually we'll have voting systems that, instead of being the last step in a conversation, estimate deliberative distance and group people for conversation who are more likely to advance reflective equilibrium ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reflective_equilibrium ) but until then, just feel it out--of the people you disagree with, who is at an "ideal deliberative distance""? What if you were more charitable? What if you were more honest?

2
Share
Share this post

ON IDEAL DELIBERATIVE DISTANCE

adamgolding.substack.com
2 Comments
author
Adam Golding
Jul 15, 2022Author

PREQUEL: https://adamgolding.substack.com/p/too-many-rifts

Expand full comment
Reply
author
Adam Golding
Jul 15, 2022Author

SEQUEL: https://adamgolding.substack.com/p/what-alternative-is-there-to-radical

Expand full comment
Reply
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Adam Golding
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing