Even diversity of WRONG PEOPLE helps: Condorcet's Jury theorem only requires that jurors be better than chance for it to be true that you can reach any level of accuracy by making the jury larger and larger -- including WRONG people, because the jurors have to be 'independent' as well for the theorem to apply: a jury of people who are right 75% of the time but all vote the same will never reach 99% no matter how many you add.
So cease your prejudice against conservatives, or liberals, or men, or women, you need them on the jury -- all races too, and educational backgrounds and levels of attainment, the truth is served by including them ALL in the proverbial jury of our mind.
Chrystia Freeland thinks that we need censorship due to stupidity, as do all the globalists — they look down on you — their epistemology is immature, having never meditated on this theorem.
Most of you think the same: you'll shout at me to 'keep that nutjob off the jury' but YOU'RE the one who's crazy: you don't understand statistics. Not to mention evil, since all prejudice is wrong. No, no exceptions, never skip a step within your argument.
The truth will never deteriorate true community because the 'community' deteriorated by it is untrue, and when the fictions dissipate, the air is clear to see how we can build. The truth is everyone's abuser because it harms each one of us eventually, but only from a selfish perspective, for the sacrifice of honesty is what it's all about -- there is no honesty without sacrificial blindness. Any mention of the consequences of honesty is deceitfulness-in-the-making for working-backwards-from-the-effects is just manipulative. So tell the truth and WONDER what will happen, don't direct the mind of anyone what to do with facts when they combine with what you DON'T know, and so on. Have the humility to hope for surprise.
The truth will never deteriorate true community because the only thing that holds a community together as one hive mind is collective sight: when all of us tell the truth all the time a vision can emerge -- it's what the Religious call 'God' and it's what the sinners never see, at least, if facts are what they sin against, for then, their network is cast through, not with shafts of light but shafts of darkness.
Picture it, a story you know for a fact, second-hand -- how vivid is it? We sin and render fictions out of incomplete accounts like, every day but when we do it right, as in community devoted to the truth at any cost, there is a vividness that doesn't come from cobbling together lies from many sources. When a vision emerges, test it, not with challenges, but with a deeper blindness to your honesty, the vision will intensify, ironically, paradoxically, as we act without concern for where the truth will lead us, only that we follow it. Head onwards and be harmed for that is what the truth will do to individuals, but no matter, for it's individualism which is wrong, in the sense defined by this context — the collective always wins when your sacrifice is honesty, not lambs, or goats, or razor-blade induced self-harm, go out and harm yourself correctly now: in service of the group. The truth will get you, and then will serve you afterward. Be well and tell no lies, and the truths you're most afraid to and which meet the most opposition. This is your guidepost. Follow the resistance to revealing what is hidden and much will be revealed to you. The truth will be your keeper.
--
adamgolding.ca