The Polytheistic Religion of Anarchism: A New Path to Freedom
co-authored with ChatGPT
[this is unedited output, only the first prompt is missing]
The world is full of diverse religious beliefs, but what if there was a new religion that combined elements of polytheism, anarchism, and the reverence of those who have challenged authority and been killed for their beliefs? This new religion would include figures such as Jesus, Socrates, and Emma Goldman as members of its pantheon, with a focus on questioning power and domination in all aspects of life. In this treatise, we will explore the relationships between anarchism, polyamory, and the veneration of those who have been killed for their beliefs, and we will conclude with a set of axioms for adherents to follow.
Anarchism, as defined by Noam Chomsky, is a "tendency in human thought to question power, domination, hierarchy, and submission". This approach to life is not just a political position, but a method of questioning that drives many people to question other institutions such as the church, the state, and even science. It is a form of methodological anarchism that encourages people to critically examine the power structures that govern their lives and to seek a more equal and just world.
Thanks for reading Open Letters! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
Polyamory is a form of ethical non-monogamy that involves having multiple romantic partners with the informed consent of everyone involved. Relationship anarchy, on the other hand, is not a subset of polyamory. It is an approach to relationships that seeks to minimize power dynamics and control, instead advocating for open communication and mutual autonomy. While this approach may lead to multiplicity of love, it can also be practiced without it. The principles of relationship anarchy align well with anarchism, as they both seek to question and challenge traditional power structures in relationships and in society as a whole.
The pantheon of this new religion would include figures such as Jesus, Socrates, and Emma Goldman, who challenged authority and power in their own unique ways. These individuals represent the ideal of questioning authority and standing up for what they believed in, even in the face of opposition. Proudhon, the French philosopher and anarchist, considered Jesus to be "the first anarchist". Jesus' message of love and equality challenged the political and religious power structures of his time, just as anarchism challenges the political and religious power structures of our own time. Socrates was a seeker of truth who refused to be silenced by those in power, and his teachings continue to inspire people to this day. Emma Goldman, a feminist and anarchist, was a strong advocate for anarchism, free love, and sexual freedom, and her ideas have continued to influence those seeking a more equal and just society.
Here is a list of 20 potential gods in the pantheon, each of whom have challenged power and authority in their own unique way:
Jesus (d. 30 CE)
Socrates (d. 399 BCE)
Emma Goldman (d. 1940)
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (d. 1865)
Miguel de Unamuno (d. 1936)
Gustav Landauer (d. 1919)
Simon Radowitzky (d. 1956)
Sacco and Vanzetti (d. 1927)
Nestor Makhno (d. 1934)
Mikhail Bakunin (d. 1876)
Luigi Galleani (d. 1931)
Errico Malatesta (d. 1932)
August Spies (d. 1887)
Bartolomeo Vanzetti (d. 1927)
Ferdinando Nicola Sacco (d. 1927)
Camillo Berneri (d. 1937)
Antonio Gramsci (d. 1937)
Emma Bonino (b. 1948)
Maria Isolina Ferre (d. 2003)
Noam Chomsky (b. 1928)
Incorporating the ideas of these figures, we can construct a set of axioms that represents the set-theoretic intersection of the assertions entailed by their words. These axioms would serve as guiding principles for adherents of this new religion:
Question power, domination, hierarchy, and submission.
Seek equality and justice in all aspects of life.
Challenge traditional power structures in relationships and society.
Seek truth and stand up for what you believe in.
Minimize power dynamics and control in relationships.
Advocate for open communication and mutual autonomy.
Support freedom of thought and expression.
Uphold ethical non-monogamy and sexual freedom.
Revere those who have challenged authority and been killed or oppressed for their beliefs.
Celebrate diversity and pluralism in all forms.
In conclusion, this new religion combines the ideas of anarchism, polyamory, and the veneration of those who have challenged authority and been killed for their beliefs. By embracing the ideas of figures like Jesus, Socrates, and Emma Goldman, and following the axioms laid out here, people can work towards creating a more equal and just world, free from power and domination.
How does this apply to BDSM?
The principles of relationship anarchy can also apply to BDSM relationships. In BDSM, power dynamics play a significant role in the dynamics of the relationship, and some practitioners prioritize the informed consent and communication that is also a cornerstone of relationship anarchy. By rejecting societal norms around relationships and power, BDSM can also be seen as a form of anarchism within the realm of sexuality.
Adherents to this philosophy of relationship anarchy within BDSM may prioritize respect for their partners, communication about boundaries and desires, and a rejection of societal norms that dictate how relationships and power dynamics should function. Just as in polyamorous relationships, BDSM practitioners who follow relationship anarchy principles strive to minimize power imbalances and create a framework for mutual respect and autonomy.
Incorporating these principles can lead to healthier, more fulfilling BDSM relationships where all participants feel heard, respected, and empowered. It is important to note that BDSM can be practiced in many different ways, and relationship anarchy is just one of the many approaches that indals may choose to incorporate into their BDSM dynamics
how does this apply to government
The principles of anarchism and relationship anarchy can be applied to government in the sense that they both challenge traditional power structures and question the legitimacy of authority. In a similar way that relationship anarchists strive for open communication, autonomy, and a minimization of power dynamics in their relationships, anarchists strive for a society without hierarchy and domination, where people govern themselves in a decentralized manner. This could manifest as a rejection of traditional governmental structures and a push for a more direct and participatory form of governance, such as a form of direct democracy.
Furthermore, the reverence of figures who have been killed by the state for their beliefs and ideas can also be applied to government. By celebrating those who have stood up against unjust authority and been executed for their beliefs, anarchism and relationship anarchism encourage individuals to question and challenge the power structures of the state. This can help to promote a more just and equal society, where people are free to express their beliefs and ideas without fear of repression.
how does this apply to music?
The principles of anarchism, polyamory, and the veneration of those killed for their beliefs can be applied to many aspects of life, including music. Just as anarchism challenges traditional power structures in society and polyamory challenges traditional power dynamics in relationships, the principles of this new religion can be applied to the music industry.
In the music industry, there are often power structures that dictate who has control over the creation and distribution of music, and the profits that come with it. This often results in a small group of people having control over the industry, and a large portion of musicians being exploited for their talent and creativity.
By applying the principles of anarchism and relationship anarchy, musicians and fans of music can challenge these power structures and work towards a more equal and just industry. This could mean promoting independent musicians and music production, or supporting collective ownership models for music production and distribution. It could also mean promoting a culture of mutual respect and consent within the music community, rather than exploitation and domination.
The pantheon of this new religion can also serve as a source of inspiration for musicians. By drawing from the teachings and beliefs of figures like Jesus and Socrates, musicians can create music that challenges traditional power structures and promotes equality and justice. This could lead to the creation of new and innovative forms of music, as well as a renewed focus on the role of music in promoting social change.
In conclusion, the principles of anarchism, polyamory, and the veneration of those killed for their beliefs can be applied to many aspects of life, including music. By questioning traditional power structures and promoting equality and justice, this new religion can inspire musicians and fans of music to create a more just and equal industry.
how does this apply to sex?
The principles of anarchism and relationship anarchy can also be applied to sexual relationships and practices. Just as anarchism questions traditional power structures in society and relationship anarchy seeks to minimize power dynamics in intimate relationships, individuals practicing ethical non-monogamy and BDSM can question traditional notions of power in sexual relationships.
In BDSM, power play can be used as a way to explore and challenge power dynamics in a consensual and safe manner. The emphasis on informed consent and mutual autonomy aligns with the principles of anarchism and relationship anarchy, as all parties involved must be in agreement and have agency in the dynamics of the relationship.
Similarly, ethical non-monogamy and open relationships can challenge traditional power dynamics in sexual relationships by promoting equal power among partners and prioritizing communication and consent. These practices align with the principles of anarchism and relationship anarchy, as they encourage individuals to question traditional power structures and seek a more equal and just dynamic in their sexual relationships.
In conclusion, the principles of anarchism and relationship anarchy can be applied to a variety of aspects of life, including sexual relationships and practices. By questioning traditional power dynamics and promoting equality, informed consent, and mutual autonomy, individuals can create relationships that align with their personal beliefs and values.
how does this apply to drugs?
The principles of anarchism and the questioning of power and domination can apply to the issue of drug use as well. The War on Drugs and the criminalization of drug use can be seen as a manifestation of state power and control. Advocates of anarchism may argue that individuals should have the autonomy to make their own choices about drug use, free from government interference and regulation.
However, this does not mean that anarchism supports the irresponsible use of drugs or the neglect of their potentially harmful effects. Rather, anarchism encourages a critical examination of the social, political, and economic factors that contribute to drug use and addiction, and seeks to address these root causes instead of punishing individuals who use drugs.
In the context of drug use, anarchism emphasizes the importance of harm reduction, education, and community-based approaches to address drug-related issues, rather than relying solely on punishment and repression by the state.
how does this apply to monotheism?
The philosophy of anarchism, with its focus on questioning power, domination, and hierarchy, can be applied to the monotheistic tradition in a number of ways. Monotheistic religions often have a strong central authority, such as a Pope or a religious leader, who holds power and makes decisions for the community. This centralization of power can be seen as a form of domination, and anarchism would encourage individuals to question it.
Additionally, monotheistic traditions often have strict moral codes and beliefs that are imposed on individuals. Anarchism, with its focus on individual autonomy and self-determination, would encourage individuals to question these strict codes and beliefs, and to make their own decisions about what is right and wrong for them.
Furthermore, monotheistic religions often have a hierarchical structure, with certain individuals, such as priests or religious leaders, having more authority and power than others. Anarchism would encourage individuals to question this hierarchy and to seek a more equal and just system.
In conclusion, the principles of anarchism can be applied to the monotheistic tradition by encouraging individuals to question the centralization of power, the imposition of moral codes and beliefs, and the hierarchical structures within monotheistic religions.
How does this apply to ghosting?
Ghosting, or the act of abruptly ending a relationship or social interaction without explanation, can be seen as a manifestation of power dynamics and control. By ghosting someone, the person who engages in the behavior exerts power over the other person and asserts control over the situation by not allowing the other person to have closure or to express their feelings and thoughts.
From the perspective of anarchism and relationship anarchy, ghosting can be seen as a negative and harmful behavior that perpetuates power imbalances and reinforces control and domination in relationships. The principles of anarchism and relationship anarchy advocate for open communication, mutual autonomy, and minimizing power dynamics, so ghosting goes against these values.
In a relationship anarchic framework, ghosting would not be seen as an acceptable form of ending a relationship or social interaction. Instead, open communication and mutual autonomy would be emphasized, with both parties having a say in how the relationship or interaction ends and how feelings and thoughts are expressed. This approach aligns with the ideals of anarchism and relationship anarchy, which prioritize questioning power and domination in all aspects of life.
list those who were executed by the state for their beliefs chronologically in terms of when they were killed
Here is a list of individuals who were executed by the state for their beliefs, listed in chronological order based on when they were killed:
Socrates (399 BC)
Jesus of Nazareth (30 AD)
Giordano Bruno (1600 AD)
William Tyndale (1536 AD)
Jan Hus (1415 AD)
Joan of Arc (1431 AD)
Michael Servetus (1553 AD)
Baruch Spinoza (1632-1677 AD)
Miguel Hidalgo (1811 AD)
Maximilien Robespierre (1794 AD)
These individuals represent a diverse range of beliefs and practices, but what they have in common is that they were all executed by the state for challenging authority and for advocating for ideas that were seen as threatening to the status quo. Despite the risks they faced, these individuals refused to back down from their beliefs and continued to fight for what they believed was right, even in the face of death.
Thanks for reading Open Letters! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.