Some believe in world peace -- that a time with no war is possible.
Far fewer believe in world honesty -- that a time with no lies is possible.
And yet, the one requires the other, because dishonesty is warfare. He who lies first, strikes first, and there is no peaceful way to deceive someone.
This wide discrepancy points to a pervasive inconsistency: How can we be working towards world peace without endorsing the most radical and chaotic forms of honesty imaginable?
With selective honesty, world peace is not possible. With radical honesty, your personal safety is not guaranteed. So, if the reason you wanted world peace was for your personal safety, you’re barking up the wrong tree and you've got another thing coming. Get back to us when you want world peace more than safety for yourself.
So, is world peace possible? Not if you tell a single lie, motherfucker! Sacrifice yourself to the collective with sacrificial, blind honesty: do not tell the truth tactically, or work backwards from a goal -- the most aimless are the most honest. Goals are our undoing. (See 'Goodhart's Law')
Tell literally any truth to anyone who will listen; the consequences be damned.
--
adamgolding.ca
MORE ON RADICAL HONESTY:
What alternative is there to radical honesty?
What alternative is there to radical honesty? My wife asked me recently if I've ever regretted telling the truth... I thought for a long time and couldn't think of a single example. I've definitely regretted (and resented) white lies, glaring omissions, deceptions, and the like.
Radical Honesty vs Non-Violent Communication
“Radical Honesty encourages people to express their judgments and opinions honestly, even if they may be hurtful or offensive to others. In contrast, Nonviolent Communication discourages judgment and encourages people to communicate in a way that is non-judgmental, empathetic, and respectful.”
How to Adopt Radical Honesty as Party Policy
What steps would be necessary to implement a party policy of 'radical honesty' that trumps all others, including considerations of victory? As a co-founder of The Socialist Alliance, Barry Weisleder asked me, as 'the resident anarchist' to propose a system of party rules, trusting me to suggest the fewest and least repressive rules possible. I found t…